So You Murdered Charlie Kirk

Congratulations.

As to be expected with any high profile public figure, the media was instantaneously rushing to the airwaves to condone, with glee in their eyes, they pronounce with certainty that it was Charlie’s fault for being murdered.

Just as it was Iryna Zarutska’s fault for being murdered on a North Carolina train.

So seems to be true with any murder that is committed by a democrat. “They had it coming!” the democrats will wail.

Oh, but the old saying of “Crimes for thee, but not for me.” seems to be the life long slogan of the democrat party; from the early days of the 1800’s, the democrat party has always represented slavery, oppression and if that doesn’t work, then violence into submission.

While the internet buzzes with speculation, mixed into those millions of post are the muttering of “you didn’t accomplish anything, you woke us up.” or “One more shot and it’s war.”

The question is, how many more shots before the internet keyboard warriors finally say enough is enough. The answer, sadly is: status quo.

So why did this happen?

Activist judges, appointed by…you guessed it, democrats. Some of these so called judges do not even hold a law degree. I mean, why would they while they preside over a legal case that requires you to know the law.

To be short and very blunt, all of this and the rest of the high profile murders or attempted murders lies solely on the back of congress.